Use of cookies
Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our website you agree that we can use cookies. Read more about our Privacy Policy and visit the following link: Privacy Policy
Alongside the prevalences based on RKI population-representative surveys, the additional use of DaTraV data enables even greater stratification of the documented prevalence. In particular, people of advanced age are also included, and the results can be depicted by at federal state level. It should be noted that analyses of DaTraV data yield slightly higher prevalence estimates than analyses of population-based survey data, reflecting differences in reference population, age range, and data collection.
Indikatoren_ScreenreaderHinweis_Datentabelle
Indikatoren_ScreenreaderHinweis_Datentabelle
Indikatoren_ScreenreaderHinweis_Datentabelle
Indikatoren_ScreenreaderHinweis_Datentabelle
Indikatoren_ScreenreaderHinweis_Datentabelle
In 2013, diabetes prevalence shows a lower prevalence of 11.2% for women 18 years and older compared to 12.6% for men 18 years and older, which is 11.9% across both genders. The prevalence increases significantly up to the age group of persons 80 years and older. While it is still 1.5% in the 30-39 age group, it rises to 9.8% in the 50-59 age group and reaches 33.1% in the age group 80 years and older. This picture is basically similar for both sexes, but women show the lower values in every age group from 40 years onwards. In 2011, the highest prevalence for both women and men is shown in Saxony-Anhalt, with 16.1% and 16.4%, respectively. In general, the new federal states and Saarland (women: 12.5%; men: 13.7%) show the highest values; at the same time, the lowest values are documented for Schleswig-Holstein (women: 8.6%; men: 10.3%) and Hamburg (women: 7.8%; men: 9.5%).
For both sexes, the documented prevalence presented according to 10-year age bands increases with chronological age. The regional distribution pattern resembles that from RKI survey data and can be partly explained by differences in population structure between the German states (Diederichs et al., 2017). Other possible causes are regional differences in diabetes risk factors (Diederichs et al., 2017), diabetes diagnosis (Heidemann et al., 2016), and social deprivation (Kroll et al., 2017). It should be noted that the majority of persons with diabetes have type 2 diabetes. On the basis of data from the sub-sample of insured persons of one statutory health insurance, 93% of all documented diabetes cases were assigned to type 2 diabetes, 5.5% to type 1 diabetes, and 0.4% to other specific forms of diabetes according to a developed algorithm (Reitzle et al. 2022).